This article describes radio
and antenna ideas you can try, ranging from tapping into your TV antenna
or rabbit ears, to purchasing the reasonably priced General Electric
Super Radio III.
PART 1: Why you can
hear FM 91.5 in your car - but NOT at home
PART 2: The Better FM 91.5 Receive Antenna System
PART 3: The Better Receiver
PART 4: Bottom Line
PART
1: Why you can hear FM 91.5 in your car - but NOT at home
You may find it frustrating to hear FM 91-5 right into your driveway and then, in your own living room and on all your home receivers, there's nothing to be heard but static. The reasons for this involve several factors. First and foremost, automobile radios are optimized radio systems designed for pulling in stations on the move, often from weak stations with widely varying signal strengths. Then toss in the concept that your basic home radio is (how can I put this gently) nothing too terrific (and that was most gentle).
Back to basics for a second. The two basic elements of a superior receiving system are the tuner and the antenna. The weakest links in home receivers are, typically, the tuner and the antenna. Add to this mix of a poorly designed home tuner, armed with a poor antenna, trying to pull in a weak FM 91-5 signal some home-generated electronic noise and electronic shading from metallic surroundings, and your listening pleasure is going to be in serious trouble.
So the answer to better home reception involves either running audio cabling from your car into the home (not a likely scenario), or bolstering the home antenna system, home tuner or, hopefully, both.
Unfortunately, most home receivers are designed to receive only the most powerful local stations using an AC "line-cord" antenna or, at best, a telescoping FM whip antenna. Some higher quality home stereo component tuners and receivers do have separate antenna connectors on the rear of the radio, but all too often the owners fail to utilize this critical connection. These connectors are often also connected to either a "line-cord" antenna or a dangling wire used for FM reception. This antenna situation will render a decent tuner's chance of pulling in weaker stations such as FM 91-5 dismal at best.
So what's an FM 91-5 listener to do?
First, if your receiver has those antenna connections, try to connect a better FM antenna to that receiver. No matter how good the tuner, it's only as good as the antenna used to capture those weak signals. But, be careful here… sometimes a high price tag is NOT necessarily the best antenna buy. The same is true of some highly publicized receivers.
If all you currently have are those typical AM/FM receivers that don't allow you that external antenna option, you may have to upgrade both the receiver and the antenna.
PART 2: The Better FM 91.5 Receive
Antenna System
I'll presume that if you feel the need for a better FM antenna system, then either you're not receiving FM 91-5 very well or perhaps not receiving it at all. If you can pull in the station on your car radio outside your home, then all isn't lost for quality home reception. The first step is to give your receiver a good fighting chance by connecting the best antenna possible for your situation.
Home FM Antennas come in two basic flavors: the outdoor and the indoor. Then each flavor antenna comes with several options. There are amplified and passive (non-amplified) as well as directional and non-directional antennas.
A major consideration with FM antennas is height. Since FM signals are essentially line-of-sight, the higher the antenna above ground (or average terrain), the better your long-range reception.
Finally, you have to consider how long the cable is between your antenna and the receiver, and the type of cable used. Generally a "TV" type coaxial cable is suitable for most FM receiver antenna installations as long as the cable run is about 75 feet (or less). In this case, less is better.
First, let's consider an outdoor-type FM antenna system. This is the best scenario for serious listeners. If pulling in a better 91-5 signal is the receive goal, then a directional antenna is FAR superior to an omnidirectional (non-directional) antenna. Put the antenna as high as possible outside the home and use a short, direct run of coaxial cable (RG-6) into the receiver. You may have to use a little matching transformer on one or both ends of the coaxial cable. This will allow a proper connection to the antenna and your receiver if they aren't designed for coaxial cable directly. The antenna is then aimed at the FM 91-5 Newbury transmitter site.
If you are unable to mount this antenna outside on a high mast, you can often achieve excellent results by mounting it in your attic (presuming that the attic is not covered up with aluminum siding).
There are several manufacturers of these antennas. A couple that are worth a look are the Winegard R6000 Prostar and the Winegard HD6065P. According to their advertising
"The PR6000 is a four element flat yagi antenna for FM reception. Recommended for suburban areas where a moderately directive antenna is required. Completely factory preassembled, unfolds in seconds for easy installation. 300 ohm input." Price is about $20.00
The Winegard HD6065P Outdoor FM Antenna is for "the very finest FM and FM stereo reception from stations near or far. Same rugged construction features as outdoor TV antennas including built-in weatherproof 75 ohm downlead housing. Deigned to cut distortion, separate adjacent channels and reduce or eliminate fading and noise." Price is about $72.00.
If in the metro Akron/Cleveland area, I do not recommend an amplified antenna of any kind. Often amplified antennas will not only do a fine job of amplifying the FM stations, but they often do a pretty good job of amplifying every other nearby transmitter and all the noise they can find, thereby canceling out any benefit to the amplified FM signal that you are seeking. Stick to a good basic passive antenna and you'll not have to worry about added interference.
Here's another excellent option. Some of you may be able to benefit from hooking your outdoor TV antenna into your FM receiver. Many homes that have since switched over to cable TV may have these vestiges on their roofs waiting to be pressed back into useful service. Of course you'll have to rotate the antenna toward FM 91-5 and lock it down (or it'll never provide peak performance).
Of course not everybody has an unused TV antenna or can put a multi-element FM (TV like) antenna in their attic or on their roof. For you, we'll have to drop back to plan B: the indoor antenna.
The first thing to try, in case you never hooked it up, is that flat "twin-lead" dipole antenna that probably was supplied with your receiver. It amazes me how many times I've seen home receivers that have NO antenna whatsoever connected to its antenna terminals (and folks wonder why the reception is so poor). If you have already connected it, and it's just in a bundle on the floor, try spreading the out the leads as far as they'll go and position it broadside to FM 91-5 (Newbury).
Moving it closer to a window, or higher, will sometimes help too. It may take a little experimentation to achieve good results. In case you don't have a twin lead Dipole and want to try one, they're available many places including K-Mart, Wal Mart and Radio Shack (who recently raised the price beyond what it should be).
A good mail-order option for this antenna (about $1.99 to $2.29) is:
http://www.mcmelectronics.com/product/30-1535&cid=prodCrossSell
or (the F-connector coax version)...
http://www.mcmelectronics.com/product/30-1530&cid=prodCrossSell
If the twin-lead dipole antenna is close, but not quite enough antenna to do the job, your basic TV "Rabbit Ears" antenna is another cost-effective alternative. A couple of inexpensive options are available locally.
You'll want to ignore any UHF cables and only deal with the VHF cables for connection to your receiver.
If you're old enough to have grown up with the music of FM 91-5, then you're no doubt familiar with the TV Rabbit Ears routine. But just to review... these rabbit ears antennas will require some experimentation to bring in the best signal. That single, multi-position knob and orienting those two telescoping elements should allow for some excellent optimization on FM 91-5. Generally pulling those elements out all the way and then rotating the antenna and the knob for best reception will do the trick.
Again, I stress that there's no need for expensive amplified versions, or even the UHF loop, but you will have to play around with the rabbit ears for best results and perhaps even relocate it to a different room for best results. Also, those new “HDTV” antennas may do you little or no good (since some are NOT focused on VHF reception). A 3 foot piece of wire would perform better on FM frequencies.
Be aware of devices that might cause locally produced interference into your system (such as computers, TV sets, motors and anything that makes little sparks). Again, experimentation will reveal how far you'll want to keep the antenna away from those noise generators.
One nice thing about these indoor antennas is that the cable line loss is almost nothing! So all the signal it receives goes right into the tuner. Another feature is, in spite of having to play around with it a bit, installation is easy. (Hey it sure beats climbing around on your roof). Do be careful to unpack it all so that it can be re-packed good as new if return is necessary… and always ask about the store's return policy.
If you do nothing more than stretch out whatever antenna is already on your receiver, be it the AC line-cord or a dangling piece of wire, you may help things considerably. If you've never tried this, give it a try.
To review your FM 91-5 antenna options, going from best to worst:
| Antenna Options |
The Directional FM outdoor antenna (Winegard PR6000 Prostar ~ $20.00 or Winegard HD6065P ~ $72.00) |
The Outdoor VHF TV antenna aimed at 91-5/Newbury (Free?) |
The indoor VHF TV Rabbit ears antenna (about $10.00 to $13.00) |
The Twin-lead Dipole Antenna ~ $2.99 |
A piece of wire or line cord antenna (oriented to the best position) |
As you see, the best option is the Directional FM Outdoor antenna. For indoor use, the cheap VHF-TV rabbit ears may be all you need. If you happen to live in a big high rise building and none of this is of value, then gather the residents and demand that the landlord install a directional FM antenna on the roof aimed at 91-5 and feed it to all units in the building!
If none of these antenna options works well for you, then it may be time to consider relocating to a new home or buying a better receiver. Considering the pain of moving... a receiver upgrade may be the next move.
PART 3: The Better Receiver
If you got to this chapter and still need help, I'll presume that you've exhausted all practical antenna options discussed in Chapter 2 and now are in search of a better receiver (or tuner...which is the receiver minus the big audio amplifiers).
First let's start with a few basics to be aware of when receiver shopping. As mentioned earlier, a key to good weak signal reception is a good antenna. If the receiver has no external antenna input then you're already in trouble. So rule 1 is always being sure the receiver can accept an external antenna. This can be either twin lead or coaxial cable.
Next you'll want to consider the two most important tuner technical specifications: sensitivity and selectivity. Sensitivity refers to the ability to hear weak signals and selectivity deals with being able to reject adjacent stations. Anything in depth here will quickly run away from the concept of keeping this series easy for all, so I'll simply suggest that if shopping for a new receiver, be aware that a good receiver should be both sensitive and selective.
Sometimes the importance of the selectivity of a tuner is under-emphasized. In a crowded radio market such as Cleveland, this is a big mistake. Often the receiver with superior selectivity, will outperform the more sensitive, yet less selective one.
I recommend that whatever you end up with try to make certain that it has either a stereo/mono switch (i.e., the ability to switch to mono if the signal is too weak for good stereo), or is a mono receiver. Weak stereo signals equal noisy reception! Although one of the nice things about FM 91-5 is the stereo presentation, I'm sure you'd rather hear a clean MONO signal than a noisy, annoying stereo one. So if the radio isn't stereo, so much the better...remember our goal here is a BETTER 91-5 signal and one that you can enjoy all day long.
Finally I should also mention that if you 91-5 fans are tempted to waste any money on a so-called “HD” receiver…don’t bother. It’ll do you no good whatsoever to help your 91-5 reception and with the needless engineering built into it, your attempts to improve your 91-5 receiver may be better found elsewhere. Stick with the best basic mono FM performer you can find.
OK...you may be saying: "Enough teckie talk....
What's a good receiver… and try to leave me a few bucks for food and rent."
PULL the CAR INTO THE HOUSE!
If you're NOT a "Do-it-your-selfer," then I suggest you skip this section.
But, if you're a bit handy...and want a superior system that often meets all the guidelines above and won't cost you a bundle, then allow me to refer you back to Chapter One. This is the chapter that discussed why you can receive 91-5 so well in your car and not in your home. A bad suggestion was to run speaker wires from the car into the house. Another bad one is to drive the car into your living room.
But...if you were to take just the car radio into the home, connect it to a decent antenna, and add a 120 volt AC to 12 volt DC power supply and a couple of speakers... you'd have an excellent FM receiving system. Many excellent auto radios are available from "junk yards" or flea markets for a few dollars ($5-10)! Every time someone replaces that factory AM/FM job with a fancy CD or Cassette model, another perfectly good surplus radio hits the used market.
OK...it does take some handiwork to connect it up. You have to properly connect: a DC power supply - (about $32 from MCM via mail order)
http://www.mcmelectronics.com/product/TENMA-72-8140-/72-8140,
a pair of speakers and an antenna (even an auto whip antenna might do the trick). But if you're handy and you've never considered it before, you may want to give it a try. I think you'll be pleased with what you get for about $65.00 or MUCH less (depending on what you have around the house).
"I'M NOT HANDY...But not willing to spend lots of bucks either!" OK...I have several specific bottom line recommendations... all easily available by toll-free mail-order....or on the internet. First, allow me to suggest the famous "GE Super Radio III." (now renamed the RCA Model 7887 Super Radio). Although this radio is very popular with AM fans (due to its excellent AM tuner/antenna), it's also a most excellent FM performer. It is essentially a big portable mono radio with a large, built-in speaker system and bass and treble controls that gives it a most impressive sound, especially for the price. It also has those important FM (& AM) antenna terminals on the rear (requiring a transformer for coaxial cable). The built-in whip antenna even does an impressive job by itself. It's not digital which allows the advantage to offset the tuning slightly when faced with a strong adjacent channel that's splattering onto 91-5. Although it runs on AC, it also takes 6 big "D" cells, which may come in handy when the lights go out!
The downside with this receiver is that it's NOT built for much abuse...so you'll want to set it on 91-5, turn it on and leave it alone! The price seems to typically be in the $50.00 (+ s/h) area. Amazon.com seems to be a place for a good deal on this receiver with a cost of ~ $42.00 including free shipping.
If you're looking for something that looks a bit classier (in a wood grain case) ... then... a manufacturer worthy of checking out is Sangean who makes an analog AM/FM wooden cabinet table-top radio called the WR-11 (available for ~ $100 or less at J&R Music)
http://www.jr.com/sangean/pe/SGN_WR11/
A digital clock radio version is the WR-2.
http://www.jr.com/sangean/pe/SGN_WR2_hy_BK/
For those who insist upon stereo, you may wish to look at their WR-3 which is loaded with more than just basic AM/FM Stereo (including RDS).
http://www.sangean.com/downloads/flyers/WR-3.pdf
As expected, all these radios have the required external coaxial antenna jack to connect to your high-quality external antenna. I haven’t personally tested the Sangean radios but have read several good reviews and they have all the requite features desired. If any of you happen to take one for a test drive, let me know how it performed for you at your fringe location.
If you're tempted to run to the phone to order one of those Bose Receivers whose infomercials and print ads are EVERYWHERE...I might suggest that (unless you have money burning a holes in your pockets)...you consider one of the stereo option above. Keep in mind that a good MONAURAL signal beats out a noisy stereo one, especially for music produced in the 40’s…and weak stereo signals WILL be noisy!
Of course those listed above are just a few of what’s out there. The list of old and new high quality tuner and receiver offerings are many and could run into many hundreds of dollars if you wish. The most important thing to remember (for you fringe folks) is to give that quality receiver a fighting chance by connecting it to a good FM antenna.
Ah yes...we return again to that fringe radio basic. The finest receiver is only as good as its antenna. So if you already own a fine tuner or receiver, make sure you provide it with the best possible antenna.
PART 4: Bottom Line
If you held my feet to the fire, although there are a lot of great options out there, all things considered, I'd probably pick the GE Superadio III (RCA Model 7887 Super Radio) as my first choice for best tuner, quality sound, appearance, simplicity, required antenna jack (switchable) and dollar value….although those Sangean products have some very good reviews/specifications and may also be excellent picks.
I hope some of this information was helpful with your efforts to pull in a cleaner, stronger FM 91-5!
Bill
www.WeisingerEngineering.com |